[fusion_builder_container hundred_percent=”no” hundred_percent_height=”no” hundred_percent_height_scroll=”no” hundred_percent_height_center_content=”yes” equal_height_columns=”no” menu_anchor=”” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” status=”published” publish_date=”” class=”” id=”” link_color=”” link_hover_color=”” border_size=”” border_color=”” border_style=”solid” margin_top=”” margin_bottom=”” padding_top=”” padding_right=”” padding_bottom=”” padding_left=”” gradient_start_color=”” gradient_end_color=”” gradient_start_position=”0″ gradient_end_position=”100″ gradient_type=”linear” radial_direction=”center center” linear_angle=”180″ background_color=”” background_image=”” background_position=”center center” background_repeat=”no-repeat” fade=”no” background_parallax=”none” enable_mobile=”no” parallax_speed=”0.3″ background_blend_mode=”none” video_mp4=”” video_webm=”” video_ogv=”” video_url=”” video_aspect_ratio=”16:9″ video_loop=”yes” video_mute=”yes” video_preview_image=”” filter_hue=”0″ filter_saturation=”100″ filter_brightness=”100″ filter_contrast=”100″ filter_invert=”0″ filter_sepia=”0″ filter_opacity=”100″ filter_blur=”0″ filter_hue_hover=”0″ filter_saturation_hover=”100″ filter_brightness_hover=”100″ filter_contrast_hover=”100″ filter_invert_hover=”0″ filter_sepia_hover=”0″ filter_opacity_hover=”100″ filter_blur_hover=”0″][fusion_builder_row][fusion_builder_column type=”1_4″ layout=”1_4″ spacing=”” center_content=”no” link=”” target=”_self” min_height=”” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” class=”” id=”” background_image_id=”” hover_type=”none” border_size=”0″ border_color=”” border_style=”solid” border_position=”all” border_radius_top_left=”” border_radius_top_right=”” border_radius_bottom_right=”” border_radius_bottom_left=”” box_shadow=”yes” box_shadow_vertical=”5px” box_shadow_horizontal=”5px” box_shadow_blur=”10″ box_shadow_spread=”10″ box_shadow_color=”#dddddd” box_shadow_style=”” padding_top=”5px” padding_right=”5px” padding_bottom=”5px” padding_left=”5px” margin_top=”” margin_bottom=”” background_type=”single” gradient_start_color=”” gradient_end_color=”” gradient_start_position=”0″ gradient_end_position=”100″ gradient_type=”linear” radial_direction=”center center” linear_angle=”180″ background_color=”” background_image=”” background_position=”left top” background_repeat=”no-repeat” background_blend_mode=”none” animation_type=”” animation_direction=”left” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_offset=”” filter_type=”regular” filter_hue=”0″ filter_saturation=”100″ filter_brightness=”100″ filter_contrast=”100″ filter_invert=”0″ filter_sepia=”0″ filter_opacity=”100″ filter_blur=”0″ filter_hue_hover=”0″ filter_saturation_hover=”100″ filter_brightness_hover=”100″ filter_contrast_hover=”100″ filter_invert_hover=”0″ filter_sepia_hover=”0″ filter_opacity_hover=”100″ filter_blur_hover=”0″ last=”no”][fusion_button link=”#” text_transform=”uppercase” title=”” target=”_self” link_attributes=”” alignment=”” modal=”” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” class=”” id=”” color=”custom” button_gradient_top_color=”#00254e” button_gradient_bottom_color=”#00254e” button_gradient_top_color_hover=”#ff9800″ button_gradient_bottom_color_hover=”#ff9800″ accent_color=”” accent_hover_color=”” type=”” bevel_color=”” border_width=”” border_radius=”2″ border_color=”” border_hover_color=”” size=”” stretch=”default” icon=”” icon_position=”left” icon_divider=”no” animation_type=”” animation_direction=”left” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_offset=””]BSS Coures[/fusion_button][fusion_separator style_type=”default” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” class=”” id=”” sep_color=”#ffffff” top_margin=”10px” bottom_margin=”10px” border_size=”0″ icon=”” icon_size=”” icon_circle=”” icon_circle_color=”” width=”” alignment=”center” /][fusion_widget_area name=”avada-custom-sidebar-coures” title_size=”” title_color=”” background_color=”” padding_top=”” padding_right=”” padding_bottom=”” padding_left=”” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” class=”” id=”” /][/fusion_builder_column][fusion_builder_column type=”3_4″ layout=”3_4″ spacing=”” center_content=”no” link=”” target=”_self” min_height=”” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” class=”” id=”” background_image_id=”” hover_type=”none” border_size=”0″ border_color=”” border_style=”solid” border_position=”all” border_radius_top_left=”” border_radius_top_right=”” border_radius_bottom_right=”” border_radius_bottom_left=”” box_shadow=”yes” box_shadow_vertical=”5px” box_shadow_horizontal=”5px” box_shadow_blur=”10″ box_shadow_spread=”10″ box_shadow_color=”#dddddd” box_shadow_style=”” padding_top=”10px” padding_right=”10px” padding_bottom=”10px” padding_left=”10px” margin_top=”” margin_bottom=”” background_type=”single” gradient_start_color=”” gradient_end_color=”” gradient_start_position=”0″ gradient_end_position=”100″ gradient_type=”linear” radial_direction=”center center” linear_angle=”180″ background_color=”” background_image=”” background_position=”left top” background_repeat=”no-repeat” background_blend_mode=”none” animation_type=”” animation_direction=”left” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_offset=”” filter_type=”regular” filter_hue=”0″ filter_saturation=”100″ filter_brightness=”100″ filter_contrast=”100″ filter_invert=”0″ filter_sepia=”0″ filter_opacity=”100″ filter_blur=”0″ filter_hue_hover=”0″ filter_saturation_hover=”100″ filter_brightness_hover=”100″ filter_contrast_hover=”100″ filter_invert_hover=”0″ filter_sepia_hover=”0″ filter_opacity_hover=”100″ filter_blur_hover=”0″ last=”no”][fusion_accordion type=”” boxed_mode=”” border_size=”0″ border_color=”” background_color=”” hover_color=”” divider_line=”” title_font_size=”” icon_size=”” icon_color=”” icon_boxed_mode=”” icon_box_color=”” icon_alignment=”” toggle_hover_accent_color=”” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” class=”” id=””][fusion_toggle title=”COURSE NUMBER AND TITLE: ANTH 201: THE RISE AND FALL OF FUNCTIONALIST PARADIGM IN ANTHROPOLOGY” open=”no” class=”” id=””]
5.3 SECOND YEAR 3RD SEMESTER BSS (HONORS)
COURSE NUMBER AND TITLE: ANTH 201: THE RISE AND FALL OF FUNCTIONALIST PARADIGM IN ANTHROPOLOGY
CREDIT HOURS: 4 (FOUR)
INTRODUCTION TO THE COURSE
The course will orient the students with the functionalist paradigm that has dominated over the areas, methods, and perspectives of the discipline anthropology in question. This course is designed with a major focus on the study of origin, development, and downfall of the functionalist paradigm in anthropology examined through Thomas Kuhnian sense.
COURSE OBJECTIVES
- Understand the works of Durkheim and Mauss about the foundation of functionalist ideas;
- Focuses on the fathers of anthropological functionalism – Bronislaw Casper Malinowski and Alfred Reginald Radcliffe-Brown;
- Understand and analyze the works of British late functionalists like Edward E. Evans-Pritchard, Meyer Fortes, Raymond Firth, and Max Gluckman;
- Understand the works of Neo-functionalists in the United States and the ‘fall’ of this ‘widespread’ and once ‘dominant’ paradigm.
UNIT WISE LEARNING OUTCOMES, COURSE CONTENTS, AND NUMBER OF CONTACT HOUR
Learning Outcomes | Course Content | Contact Hour |
Unit-1: Classical foundation of Functionalism | ||
At the end of this unit, students will be able to-
|
|
12 hrs |
Unit-2: Early Functionalism | ||
At the end of this unit, students will be able to-
|
|
12 hrs |
Mid-term Examination | ||
Unit-3: Late Functionalism | ||
At the end of this unit, students will be able to-
|
|
12 hrs |
Unit-4: American Neo-functionalism | ||
At the end of this unit, students will be able to-
|
|
10 hrs |
Unit-5: The ‘fall’ of the Functionalist School of Thought | ||
At the end of this unit, students will be able to-
|
|
10 hrs |
Semester Final Examination | ||
INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES
Lecture, Discussion, Question-answer (quiz), Observation, Debate, Workshop, ICT integration, etc.
ASSESSMENT
Class attendance, Tutorial class participation, Group presentation, Class test, Term paper, Fieldwork report, Home assignment, Mid-term examination, Oral test (viva-voce), Semester final examination.
REFERENCES
REQUIRED TEXT
Alexander, Jeffrey, and Paul Colomy
1990 Neofunctionalism Today. In Frontiers of Social Theory. George Ritzer, ed. New York: Colombia University Press.
Barnard, Alan
2001 History and Theory in Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Durkheim, Emile
1912 The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. London: Allen and Unwin.
Erickson, Paul A., and Liam D. Murphy, eds.
2001 Readings for a History of Anthropological Theory. Ontario: Broadview Press.
Evans- Pritchard, Edward Evans
1937 Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic among the Azande. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Firth, Raymond
1957 We, The Tikopia. Boston: Beacon Press.
Fortes, Meyer
1949 The Web of Kinship among the Tallensi. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fortes, Meyer, and Edward Evans Evans-Pritchard
1940 African Political Systems. London & New York: International African Institute.
Gluckman, Max
1966 Custom and Conflict in Africa. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Layton, Robert
1997 An Introduction to the Theory in Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McGee R. Jon, and Richard L. Warms
2008 Anthropological Theory: An Introductory History. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Malinowski, Bronislaw Casper
1929 The Sexual Life of Savages in North–Western Melanesia: An Ethnographic Account of Courtship, Marriage and Family Life among the Natives of Trobriand Islands, British New Guinea. New York: Halcyon House.
Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred Reginald
1952 Structure and Function in Primitive Society. London: Cohen and West Ltd.
ADDITIONAL TEXT
Douglas, Mary
1980 Evans-Pritchard. Brighton: Harvester.
Firth, Raymond, ed.
1957 Man and Culture: An Evaluation of the Work of Bronislaw Malinowski. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Geertz, Clifford
1988 Works and Lives: Anthropologists as Author. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Jarvie, I. C.
1965 Limits to Functionalism and Alternatives to it in Anthropology. In Functionalism in Social Sciences: The Strength and Limits of Functionalism in Anthropology. Don Martindale, ed. Philadelphia: The American Academy of Political and Social Sciences.
Jarvie, I. C.
1973 Functionalism. Minneapolis: Burgess Publishing Company.
Kapferer, Bruce
1987 The Anthropology of Max Gluckman. In Power, Process and Transformation: Essays in Memory of Max Gluckman (Social Analysis. Special Issues Series 22). Bruce Kapferer, ed. Adelaide: Department of Anthropology, University of Adelaide. http://www.Jstor.org/staple23169617 (to be accessed).
Kuper, Adam, ed.
1977 The Social Anthropology of Radcliffe-Brown. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Kuper, Adam
1983 Anthropology and Anthropologists: The Modern British School. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Kuper, Adam
1988 The Invention of Primitive Society: Transformations of an Illusion. London: Routledge.
Lesser, Alexander
1985 Functionalism in Social Anthropology. In History, Evolution and the Concept of Culture: Selected papers by Alexander Lesser. Sidney Mintz, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Morrison, Ken
2006 Marx, Durkheim, Weber: Formations of Modern Social Thought. London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Rangasami, Amrita
1986 Famine: The Anthropological Account: An Evaluation of the Work of Raymond Firth. Economic and Political Weekly21(36):1591-1601.
Spencer, J.
1965 The Nature and Value of Functionalism in Anthropology. In Functionalism in Social Sciences: The Strength and Limits of Functionalism in Anthropology. Don Martindale, ed. Philadelphia: The American Academy of Political and Social Sciences.
[/fusion_toggle][fusion_toggle title=”COURSE NUMBER AND TITLE: ANTH 202: INTRODUCTION TO PREHISTORY AND ARCHAEOLOGY” open=”no” class=”” id=””]
COURSE NUMBER AND TITLE: ANTH 202: INTRODUCTION TO PREHISTORY AND ARCHAEOLOGY
CREDIT HOURS: 4 (FOUR)
INTRODUCTION TO THE COURSE
The course is designed to familiarize students with the strategies to investigate archaeological remains and how these strategies contribute to the goals of archaeological anthropology.
COURSE OBJECTIVES
- Understand an introduction to theory and methods in archaeological research, data collection, and analysis;
- Understand the notion of prehistory and illustrate various prehistoric eras.
UNIT WISE LEARNING OUTCOMES, COURSE CONTENTS, AND NUMBER OF CONTACT HOUR
Learning Outcomes | Course Content | Contact Hour |
Unit-1: Archaeology and the Structure of Archaeological Inquiry | ||
At the end of this unit, students will be able to-
|
|
8 hrs |
Unit-2: Doing Fieldwork, Geo-archaeology, and Site Formation Process | ||
At the end of this unit, students will be able to-
analyze geo-archaeology and formation processes in a systematic and archaeological context. |
|
|
Unit-3: Chronology Building | ||
At the end of this unit, students will be able to-
|
|
4 hrs |
Unit-4: The Dimensions of Archaeology | ||
At the end of this unit, students will be able to-
|
|
4 hrs |
Mid-term Examination | ||
Unit-5: Taphonomy and People, Plants and Animals in the Past |
||
At the end of this unit, students will be able to-
|
|
4 hrs |
Unit-6: Bio-archaeological Approaches and Reconstructing Social and Political Systems of the Past | ||
At the end of this unit, students will be able to-
|
|
8 hrs |
Unit-7: The Concept of Prehistory | ||
At the end of this unit, students will be able to-
|
|
12 hrs |
Unit-8: Major Archaeological Sites in Bangladesh | ||
At the end of this unit, students will be able to-
|
|
4 hrs |
Semester Final Examination | ||
INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES
Lecture, Discussion, Question-answer (quiz), Observation, Debate, Workshop, ICT integration, etc.
ASSESSMENT
Class attendance, Tutorial class participation, Group presentation, Class test, Term paper, Fieldwork report, Home assignment, Mid-term examination, Oral test (viva-voce), Semester final examination.
REFERENCES
REQUIRED TEXT
Greene, Kevin
2002, Archaeology: An Introduction. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
Kelly, Robert L., and David Hurst Thomas
2013 Archaeology. Belmont: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Renfrew, Colin, and Paul Bahn
2012 Archaeology: Theories, Methods, and Practice. London: Thames and Hudson Ltd.
ADDITIONAL TEXT
Ahmed, Nazimuddin
1984Discover the Monuments of Bangladesh: A Guide to Their History, Location & Development. Dhaka: University Press Limited.
Lewis, Barry, with Robert Jurmain and Lynn Kilgore
2013 Understanding Humans: Introduction to Physical Anthropology and Archaeology. Belmont: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Scarre, Chris, ed.
2013 The Human Past: World Prehistory & the Development of Human Societies. London: the Thames and Hudson Ltd.
[/fusion_toggle][fusion_toggle title=”COURSE NUMBER AND TITLE: ANTH 203: AN INTRODUCTION TO QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN ANTHROPOLOGY” open=”no” class=”” id=””]
COURSE NUMBER AND TITLE: ANTH 203: AN INTRODUCTION TO QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN ANTHROPOLOGY
CREDIT HOURS: 4 (FOUR)
INTRODUCTION TO THE COURSE
The course introduces students with quantitative methods in anthropology. This will also provide students with a hands-on experiment of different quantitative methods in anthropology. Principles of and epistemologies associated with quantitative methodology are included and major concepts of quantitative research are introduced.
COURSE OBJECTIVES
- Understand the tradition of quantification in anthropology;
- Understand key issues of quantitative research like summarization and visual representation of quantitative data;
- Examine sampling, research design, research process, and techniques of collecting data;
- Examine univariate and bivariate analysis and calculation of probability;
- Describe the ways of generalizing and drawing an inference in quantitative research.
UNIT WISE LEARNING OUTCOMES, COURSE CONTENTS, AND NUMBER OF CONTACT HOUR
Learning Outcomes | Course Content | Contact Hour |
Unit-1: The Need for Quantification in Anthropology | ||
At the end of this unit, students will be able to-
|
|
4 hrs |
Unit-2: Basic Concepts of Quantitative Research | ||
At the end of this unit, students will be able to-
|
|
8 hrs |
Unit-3: Techniques of Summarizing Quantitative Data | ||
At the end of this unit, students will be able to-
|
|
8 hrs |
Unit-4: Visualization of Quantitative Data | ||
At the end of this unit, students will be able to-
|
|
4 hrs |
Unit-5: Sampling | ||
At the end of this unit, students will be able to-
|
|
4 hrs |
Mid-term Examination | ||
Unit-6: Quantitative Research Design and Research Process | ||
At the end of this unit, students will be able to-
|
|
4 hrs |
Unit-7: Techniques of Collecting Quantitative Data | ||
At the end of this unit, students will be able to-
|
|
4 hrs |
Unit-8: Univariate and Bivariate Analyses of Statistical Data | ||
At the end of this unit, students will be able to-
|
|
12 hrs |
Unit-9: Calculation of Probability | ||
At the end of this unit, students will be able to-
|
|
4 hrs |
Unit-10: Generalizing and drawing inference | ||
At the end of this unit, students will be able to-
|
|
4 hrs |
Semester Final Examination | ||
INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES
Lecture, Discussion, Question-answer (quiz), Observation, Debate, Workshop, ICT integration, etc.
ASSESSMENT
Class attendance, Tutorial class participation, Group presentation, Class test, Term paper, Fieldwork report, Home assignment, Mid-term examination, Oral test (viva-voce), Semester final examination.
REFERENCES
REQUIRED TEXT
Agresti, Alan, and Barbara Finalay
1997 Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.
Bernard, Russell
2011 Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Lanham: Altamira Press.
Bernard, Russell, ed.
1998 Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.
Driver, Harold E.
1953 Statistics in Anthropology. American Anthropologists 55:42-59.
Madrigal, Lorena
1998 Statistics for Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ADDITIONAL TEXT
Cochran, William G.
1954 Some Methods for the Common X² test. Biometrics 10:417-51.
Siegel, Sidney
1956 Non-parametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill
[/fusion_toggle][fusion_toggle title=”COURSE NUMBER AND TITLE: ANTH 204: POLITICAL ANTHROPOLOGY” open=”no” class=”” id=””]
COURSE NUMBER AND TITLE: ANTH 204: POLITICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
CREDIT HOURS: 4 (FOUR)
INTRODUCTION TO THE COURSE
The course is designed to provide students with an overview of the evolutionary process of political organization from cross-cultural perspectives. It will also explore the idea of the essence of formal and informal political practices in Bangladesh.
COURSE OBJECTIVES
- Understand the basic concepts and issues covered by political anthropology;
- Understand the meaning and scope of studying political anthropology with a review of its historical development;
- Analyze theories of the origin of the state;
- Understand factions and factional politics and various dimensions of political systems cross-culturally.
UNIT WISE LEARNING OUTCOMES, COURSE CONTENTS, AND NUMBER OF CONTACT HOUR
Learning Outcomes | Course Content | Contact Hour |
Unit-1: Political Anthropology | ||
At the end of this unit, students will be able to-
|
|
4 hrs |
Unit-2: Evolution of Pre-industrial Political Systems | ||
At the end of this unit, students will be able to-
|
|
4 hrs |
Unit-3: Conceptualizing Power | ||
At the end of this unit, students will be able to-
|
|
4 hrs |
Unit-4: The Perspectives of the State | ||
At the end of this unit, students will be able to-
|
|
8 hrs |
Unit-5: Significant Issues Addressed by Political Anthropology | ||
At the end of this unit, students will be able to-
|
|
|
Mid-term Examination | ||
Unit-6: Factional Politics in Cross-cultural Societies | ||
At the end of this unit, students will be able to-
|
|
4 hrs |
Unit-7: Cases of Factional Politics and the Changes in Local Level Politics in Bangladesh | ||
At the end of this unit, students will be able to-
|
|
4 hrs |
Unit-8: Social Movement, Popular Resistance, and Revolt | ||
At the end of this unit, students will be able to-
|
|
4 hrs |
Unit-9: Political Regimes of Domination and Resistance | ||
At the end of this unit, students will be able to-
|
|
8 hrs |
Unit-10: NGOs, Civil Society, and Transnationalism | ||
At the end of this unit, students will be able to-
|
|
8 hrs |
Semester Final Examination |
INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES
Lecture, Discussion, Question-answer (quiz), Observation, Debate, Workshop, ICT integration, etc.
ASSESSMENT
Class attendance, Tutorial class participation, Group presentation, Class test, Term paper, Fieldwork report, Home assignment, Mid-term examination, Oral test (viva-voce), Semester final examination.
REFERENCES
REQUIRED TEXT
Banton, Michael, ed.
1968 Political Systems and the Distribution of Power. London: Tavistock.
Dahl, Robert A.
1963 Modern Political Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Fried, Morton H.
1967 The Evolution of Political Society. New York: Random House.
Lewellen, Ted C.
2003 Political Anthropology: An Introduction. London: Praeger Publishing.
Leach, Edmund Ronald
1970[1964] Political Systems of Highland Burma: A Study of Kachin Social Structure. London: The Athlone Press.
Nugent, David and Joan Vincent.
2007 A Companion to the Anthropology of Politics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
ADDITIONAL TEXT
Barth, Fredrik
1965 Political Leadership among the Swat Pathans. Bergain: Bloomsbury Academic.
Brumfiel, Elizabeth M., and Kohn W. Fox, eds.
2003 Factional competition and political development in the New World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chowdhury, Anwarullah
1978 A Bangladesh Village: A Study of Social Stratification. Dhaka: Center for Social Studies.
Evans-Pritchard
1940 The Nuer: A Description of the Modes of Livelihood and Political Institutions of a Nilotic People. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Gluckman, Max
2012 Politics, Law and Ritual in Tribal Society. New Brunswick and London: Aldine Transaction (Transaction Publishers).
Islam, A. K. M. Aminul
1974 A Bangladesh Village: Conflict and Cohesion – An Anthropological Study of Politics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Schenkman Publishing Company.
Islam, Rafiul
2015, “Changing Political Organisation of the Oraon Ethnic Community in Bangladesh: A Case Study of Padda Panch”, The Arts Faculty Journal, Vol. 6, No. 8, Dhaka: Faculty of Arts, University of Dhaka, pp. 155-168.
Jahangir, B.K.
1979 Differentiation, Polarization, and Confrontation in Rural Bangladesh. Dhaka: Centre for Social Studies.
Karim, A. H. M. Zehadul
1990 The Pattern of Rural Leadership in an Agrarian Society: A Case Study of the Changing Power Structure in Bangladesh. New Delhi: Northern Book Centre.
Mayer Fortes, and Edward Evan Evans-Pritchard, eds.
2015 [1940] African Political Systems. New York: Routledge.
Nicholas, Ralph W.
1965 Factions: A Comparative Analysis. In Political Systems and the Distribution of Power. Michael Banton, ed. Association of Social Anthropologists, Monograph No.2. London: Tavistock Publications.
[/fusion_toggle][/fusion_accordion][/fusion_builder_column][/fusion_builder_row][/fusion_builder_container]